Current:Home > InvestBuy now, pay later companies must adhere to credit card standards, consumer agency says -Visionary Wealth Guides
Buy now, pay later companies must adhere to credit card standards, consumer agency says
View
Date:2025-04-25 09:24:56
NEW YORK (AP) — Buy now, pay later companies must provide consumers with the same legal rights and protections as credit card lenders do, the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau said Wednesday in a new rule.
That includes the right to demand a refund and to dispute transactions. The agency began an inquiry into the short-term lending industry two years ago, and it issued the rule in response to ongoing consumer complaints, it said.
Here’s what you need to know.
WHAT’S BEHIND THE NEW REGULATION?
Buy now, pay later loans are typically marketed as zero-interest, or low interest, and allow consumers to spread out payments for purchases over several weeks or months. They’re marketed as a way to buy expensive products and services over time, and the service is typically offered at checkout for online shopping. It’s often used for big-ticket items, like furniture, clothes and airline tickets.
In a report, the CFPB found that more than 13% of buy now, pay later transactions involved a return or dispute, and, in 2021, people disputed or returned $1.8 billion in transactions at the five companies surveyed.
“Regardless of whether a shopper swipes a credit card or uses Buy Now, Pay Later, they are entitled to important consumer protections under longstanding laws and regulations already on the books,” CFPB Director Rohit Chopra said in a statement.
HOW IS THE INDUSTRY RESPONDING TO THE RULE?
Two major buy now, pay later players — Affirm and Klarna — say they welcomed the regulation.
“We are encouraged that the CFPB is promoting consistent industry standards, many of which already reflect how Affirm operates, to provide greater choice and transparency for consumers,” a company spokesperson said in a statement. Affirm currently offers “dispute and error resolution assistance,” the spokesman added.
A spokesperson for Klarna said the company also already investigates consumer disputes and covers related refunds.
The agency’s announcement is a “significant step forward” in regulating the buy now, pay later industry, Klarna said in a statement. It said it has been calling for regulatory oversight “over many years.”
While some in the industry have voluntarily chosen to operate at the standard now mandated by the CFPB’s new rule, there remain significant differences between credit card lending and buy now, pay later loans. For instance, buy now, pay later lenders do not all report their loans to the three major credit bureaus. Some analysts have said this can lead consumers to overextend themselves or take on more debt than they can manage or afford.
WHAT RIGHTS DO CONSUMERS HAVE?
The CFPB said that buy now, pay later lenders need to extend many of the same rights and protections as classic credit card providers. “Importantly, these cover dispute and refund rights,” the agency said.
The agency clarified that, with its new rule, buy now, pay later lenders must:
— Investigate disputes. Lenders must also pause payment requirements during the investigation and sometimes must issue credits.
— Refund returned products or canceled services. Buy now, pay later lenders must credit the refunds to consumers’ accounts.
— Provide billing statements. Consumers must receive periodic statements of money owed similar to the ones received for classic credit card accounts.
“The failure to provide dispute protections can create chaos for consumers when they return their merchandise or encounter other billing difficulties,” the CFPB said.
___
The Associated Press receives support from Charles Schwab Foundation for educational and explanatory reporting to improve financial literacy. The independent foundation is separate from Charles Schwab and Co. Inc. The AP is solely responsible for its journalism.
veryGood! (25)
Related
- Don't let hackers fool you with a 'scam
- Swedish authorities say 5 people died when a construction elevator crashed to the ground
- Online sports betting to start in Vermont in January
- Zac Efron shouts out 'High School Musical,' honors Matthew Perry at Walk of Fame ceremony
- 'We're reborn!' Gazans express joy at returning home to north
- Son of jailed Hong Kong media mogul Jimmy Lai lobbies UK foreign secretary for his release
- Clemson defeats Notre Dame for second NCAA men's soccer championship in three years
- Busy Rhode Island bridge closed suddenly after structural problem found, and repair will take months
- Cincinnati Bengals quarterback Joe Burrow owns a $3 million Batmobile Tumbler
- Secret Santa Gifts on Amazon That Understand the Assignment & They're Under $30
Ranking
- Trump invites nearly all federal workers to quit now, get paid through September
- Our 12 favorite moments of 2023
- U.N. says Israel-Hamas war causing unmatched suffering in Gaza, pleads for new cease-fire, more aid
- Column: Rahm goes back on his word. But circumstances changed
- Paula Abdul settles lawsuit with former 'So You Think You Can Dance' co
- A New UN “Roadmap” Lays Out a Global Vision for Food Security and Emissions Reductions
- Titans vs. Dolphins Monday Night Football highlights: Tennessee rallies for shocking upset
- Shohei Ohtani’s massive $700 million deal with Dodgers defers $680 million for 10 years
Recommendation
Buckingham Palace staff under investigation for 'bar brawl'
Swedish authorities say 5 people died when a construction elevator crashed to the ground
Police warn holiday shoppers about card draining: What to know about the gift card scam
Epic wins its antitrust lawsuit against the Play Store. What does this verdict mean for Google?
House passes bill to add 66 new federal judgeships, but prospects murky after Biden veto threat
Dinosaur head found in U.K., and experts say it's one of the most complete pliosaur skulls ever unearthed
As Navalny vanishes from view in Russia, an ally calls it a Kremlin ploy to deepen his isolation
Epic wins its antitrust lawsuit against the Play Store. What does this verdict mean for Google?