Current:Home > MarketsWorld’s Leading Polluters Have Racked Up a $10 Trillion Carbon Debt -Visionary Wealth Guides
World’s Leading Polluters Have Racked Up a $10 Trillion Carbon Debt
View
Date:2025-04-16 19:38:36
The countries most responsible for global warming owe the rest of the world a tremendous debt, with the author of a new study published Monday in the journal Nature Climate Change putting the figure at $10 trillion.
The author came up with that number by calculating how much CO2 each country emitted per capita since 1960, generally recognized as the onset of the worst of human-caused global warming. Countries with high per capita emissions carry a carbon debt while countries with lower per capita emissions have a carbon credit.
“We in the rich world have over-contributed to the problem and consequently there is a debt associated with that that needs to be honored in some way,” said lead author Damon Matthews a researcher at Concordia University in Montreal, Canada.
That was the purpose of the Green Climate Fund, established in 2010 by the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC) to help vulnerable countries address the challenges of climate change. Its initial goal was to distribute $100 billion each year in public and private funding until 2020. So far wealthy nations have pledged $10.2 billion, a fraction of the debt, according to the new study.
The United States is responsible for about 40 percent of the debt.
The study concludes the carbon debt of high-emitting countries totals 250 billion metric tons of carbon dioxide since 1990. The U.S. government calculates the social cost of CO2 emissions –including property damage from increased flooding, reduced agricultural productivity and adverse effects on human health– is about $40 per metric ton of CO2.
Multiplying the two figures produces the $10 trillion figure.
Others, however, say Matthews’ accounting may be overly simplistic. According to Jan Fuglestvedt research director of the Center for International Climate and Environmental Research in Oslo, Norway, the dates chosen to calculate the debt are arbitrary. Emissions since 1960 account for about 66 percent of CO2 emissions since the start of the industrial era in 1750; emissions since 1990 are 36 percent.
Counting earlier emissions could change the debts owed by different countries, although Fuglestvedt admitted deciding when to start counting is more of a policy choice than a scientific one.
“When should we know and when should we start counting the emissions that change climate?” Fuglestvedt asked. “That goes beyond natural sciences.”
Another issue with the study is counting emissions only by country, said Liane Schalatek, who has attended Green Climate Fund board meetings on behalf of the Heinrich Böll Foundation North America, where she is associate director.
“The biggest polluters in absolute terms are not necessarily countries but entities within countries, that is very often large corporations,” Schalatek said. “If you put their pollution together [they] actually make up the majority of the pollution.”
A 2013 study funded in part by the Böll Foundation found nearly two-thirds of carbon dioxide emitted since the 1750s can be traced to the 90 largest fossil fuel and cement producers, most of which are still operating.
Although the Green Climate Fund does not address corporate responsibility, Schalatek said it is time to stop haggling about where this money will come from and time to start giving larger sums.
“They should really just say 100 billion is the minimum and we should be thinking about how we can scale that up post 2020,” Schalatek said.
Karen Orenstein, an international policy analyst for Friends of the Earth, said, however, that studies like this don’t address the real reason the carbon debt exists.
“A lot of this isn’t really about what science says or academics say,” Orenstein said. “It’s political.”
veryGood! (8821)
Related
- The Super Bowl could end in a 'three
- 'No Good Deed': Who's the killer in the Netflix comedy? And will there be a Season 2?
- Cincinnati Bengals quarterback Joe Burrow owns a $3 million Batmobile Tumbler
- NHL in ASL returns, delivering American Sign Language analysis for Deaf community at Winter Classic
- 'Survivor' 47 finale, part one recap: 2 players were sent home. Who's left in the game?
- 'No Good Deed': Who's the killer in the Netflix comedy? And will there be a Season 2?
- Bodycam footage shows high
- Costco membership growth 'robust,' even amid fee increase: What to know about earnings release
- Moving abroad can be expensive: These 5 countries will 'pay' you to move there
- Why we love Bear Pond Books, a ski town bookstore with a French bulldog 'Staff Pup'
Ranking
- Buckingham Palace staff under investigation for 'bar brawl'
- The 401(k) millionaires club keeps growing. We'll tell you how to join.
- $73.5M beach replenishment project starts in January at Jersey Shore
- Man can't find second winning lottery ticket, sues over $394 million jackpot, lawsuit says
- Google unveils a quantum chip. Could it help unlock the universe's deepest secrets?
- Romantasy reigns on spicy BookTok: Recommendations from the internet’s favorite genre
- Jorge Ramos reveals his final day with 'Noticiero Univision': 'It's been quite a ride'
- Federal court filings allege official committed perjury in lawsuit tied to Louisiana grain terminal
Recommendation
Finally, good retirement news! Southwest pilots' plan is a bright spot, experts say
'Malcolm in the Middle’ to return with new episodes featuring Frankie Muniz
US appeals court rejects Nasdaq’s diversity rules for company boards
Spooky or not? Some Choa Chu Kang residents say community garden resembles cemetery
Macy's says employee who allegedly hid $150 million in expenses had no major 'impact'
Retirement planning: 3 crucial moves everyone should make before 2025
Meta donates $1 million to Trump’s inauguration fund
'No Good Deed': Who's the killer in the Netflix comedy? And will there be a Season 2?