Current:Home > StocksCan Mississippi permanently strip felons of voting rights? 19 federal judges will hear the case -Visionary Wealth Guides
Can Mississippi permanently strip felons of voting rights? 19 federal judges will hear the case
View
Date:2025-04-18 02:32:11
NEW ORLEANS (AP) — Nineteen federal appellate judges are scheduled to hear arguments Tuesday on whether Mississippi can continue to permanently strip voting rights from people convicted of certain felonies, including nonviolent crimes for which they have served a complete sentence.
The outcome of the case will likely determine whether tens of thousands of people win back the right to vote. An immediate decision is not expected.
Criminal justice advocates won a major victory last August when a three-judge panel of the New Orleans-based 5th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals ruled that the ban violates the Constitution’s prohibition against “cruel and unusual” punishment. But the full 17-member circuit court vacated that ruling weeks later and scheduled Tuesday’s hearing.
Attorneys for the state argue that the voting ban is a “nonpunitive voting regulation” and that, even if it did constitute punishment, it isn’t cruel and unusual.
The court’s 17 full-time active judges are expected to hear arguments, along with two senior-status part-time judges who sat on the panel that ruled against the ban in August.
Under the Mississippi Constitution, people convicted of 10 specific felonies, including bribery, theft and arson, lose the right to vote. Under a previous state attorney general, the list was expanded to 22 crimes, including timber larceny and carjacking.
To have their voting rights restored, people convicted of any of the crimes must get a pardon from the governor or persuade lawmakers to pass individual bills just for them with two-thirds approval. Lawmakers in recent years have passed few of those bills, and they passed none in 2023.
“Mississippi stands as an outlier among its sister states, bucking a clear and consistent trend in our Nation against permanent disenfranchisement,” Senior Judge James Dennis wrote in the August opinion, joined by Senior Judge Carolyn Dineen King. Both judges were nominated to the court by Democratic presidents — King by Jimmy Carter and Dennis by Bill Clinton.
Also on the panel was Judge Edith Jones, still on full-time status nearly 40 years after she was nominated to the court by Republican President Ronald Reagan. In a dissent to the August ruling, Jones cited a previous Supreme Court ruling regarding felons’ disenfranchisement, saying it is up to legislatures to decide such matters.
Tuesday’s hearing will include Jones and 16 other full-time members of the court. King and Dennis will also take part because they were members of the original ruling panel. The 5th Circuit is one of the most conservative circuit appeals courts, with 12 of its full-time posts filled by nominees of Republican presidents.
veryGood! (22)
Related
- Paula Abdul settles lawsuit with former 'So You Think You Can Dance' co
- COVID Risk May Be Falling, But It's Still Claiming Hundreds Of Lives A Day
- See the Royal Family Unite on the Buckingham Palace Balcony After King Charles III's Coronation
- We Can Pull CO2 from Air, But It’s No Silver Bullet for Climate Change, Scientists Warn
- 2 killed, 3 injured in shooting at makeshift club in Houston
- Joe Biden says the COVID-19 pandemic is over. This is what the data tells us
- Prince Harry and Meghan Markle's Son Archie Turns 4 Amid King Charles III's Coronation
- There's a global call for kangaroo care. Here's what it looks like in the Ivory Coast
- 2025 'Doomsday Clock': This is how close we are to self
- Today’s Climate: June 19-20, 2010
Ranking
- South Korean president's party divided over defiant martial law speech
- Jim Hines, first sprinter to run 100 meters in under 10 seconds, dies at 76
- Today’s Climate: June 14, 2010
- Legal fights and loopholes could blunt Medicare's new power to control drug prices
- Juan Soto praise of Mets' future a tough sight for Yankees, but World Series goal remains
- COVID Risk May Be Falling, But It's Still Claiming Hundreds Of Lives A Day
- Why Queen Camilla's Coronation Crown Is Making Modern History
- Debate 2020: The Candidates’ Climate Positions & What They’ve Actually Done
Recommendation
Working Well: When holidays present rude customers, taking breaks and the high road preserve peace
Sea Level Rise Is Accelerating: 4 Inches Per Decade (or More) by 2100
Breaking Down Prince William and Kate Middleton's Updated Roles Amid King Charles III's Reign
How King Charles III's Coronation Differs From His Mom Queen Elizabeth II's
Sarah J. Maas books explained: How to read 'ACOTAR,' 'Throne of Glass' in order.
Starbucks is rolling out its olive oil drink in more major cities
Busting 5 common myths about water and hydration
How Queen Elizabeth’s Corgis Are Still Living Like Royalty