Current:Home > NewsJohnson & Johnson reaches tentative deal to resolve talc baby powder litigation -Visionary Wealth Guides
Johnson & Johnson reaches tentative deal to resolve talc baby powder litigation
View
Date:2025-04-16 08:14:31
Johnson & Johnson has reached tentative agreement to resolve talc baby powder claims with more than 40 states, the world's biggest maker of health care products confirmed on Tuesday.
"As was leaked last week, that progress includes an agreement in principle that the company reached with a consortium of 43 State Attorneys Generals to resolve their talc claims. We will continue to address the claims of those who do not want to participate in our contemplated consensual bankruptcy resolution through litigation or settlement," Erik Haas, J&J's worldwide vice president of litigation, stated.
Bloomberg News earlier this month reported that J&J struck an initial deal to pay about $700 million to resolve a probe by states into allegations it failed to warn people about the potential health risks posed by the talc in its baby powder. J&J CFO Joseph Wolk confirmed the proposed settlement in an interview Tuesday with the Wall Street Journal.
The development is the latest in decade-long legal battles and investigations into links between cancer and the talc used in one of its best-known products. More than 50,000 claims have been filed against the company, mostly on behalf of women who developed ovarian cancer.
The settlement comes after J&J tried twice without success to use bankruptcy courts to limit its exposure to talc litigation.
J&J has long maintained its talc-based products do not cause cancer. The company pulled talc-based powders off the market in North America in 2020 and now offers a product that uses cornstarch instead.
The company last year set aside roughly $400 million to resolve U.S. state consumer protection claims. That was part of a larger $8.9 billion effort in the bankruptcy filing of one of its units to settle claims its baby powder and other talc products cause cancer.
- In:
- Johnson & Johnson
Kate Gibson is a reporter for CBS MoneyWatch in New York.
veryGood! (2)
Related
- Israel lets Palestinians go back to northern Gaza for first time in over a year as cease
- American Climate: In Iowa, After the Missouri River Flooded, a Paradise Lost
- The world's worst industrial disaster harmed people even before they were born
- What Happened to Natalee Holloway: Breaking Down Every Twist in the Frustrating Case
- Opinion: Gianni Infantino, FIFA sell souls and 2034 World Cup for Saudi Arabia's billions
- Ohio man accused of killing his 3 sons indicted, could face death penalty
- Georgia police department apologizes for using photo of Black man for target practice
- Premature Birth Rates Drop in California After Coal and Oil Plants Shut Down
- FACT FOCUS: Inspector general’s Jan. 6 report misrepresented as proof of FBI setup
- Controversial Enbridge Line 3 Oil Pipeline Approved in Minnesota Wild Rice Region
Ranking
- The 401(k) millionaires club keeps growing. We'll tell you how to join.
- In Corporate March to Clean Energy, Utilities Not Required
- Gas stoves pollute homes with benzene, which is linked to cancer
- Is gun violence an epidemic in the U.S.? Experts and history say it is
- Are Instagram, Facebook and WhatsApp down? Meta says most issues resolved after outages
- Court: Federal Coal Lease Program Not Required to Redo Climate Impact Review
- Climate Change is Pushing Giant Ocean Currents Poleward
- Here's your chance to buy Princess Leia's dress, Harry Potter's cloak and the Batpod
Recommendation
Current, future North Carolina governor’s challenge of power
Does Connecticut’s Green Bank Hold the Secret to the Future of Clean Energy?
Muscular dystrophy patients get first gene therapy
Consumer Group: Solar Contracts Force Customers to Sign Away Rights
Dick Vitale announces he is cancer free: 'Santa Claus came early'
How Pruitt’s EPA Is Delaying, Weakening and Repealing Clean Air Rules
Ultimatum: Queer Love’s Vanessa Admits She Broke This Boundary With Xander
Florida Ballot Measure Could Halt Rooftop Solar, but Do Voters Know That?