Current:Home > FinanceFTC wants to ban fake product reviews, warning that AI could make things worse -Visionary Wealth Guides
FTC wants to ban fake product reviews, warning that AI could make things worse
View
Date:2025-04-17 04:22:33
If the Federal Trade Commission has its way, businesses could soon be fined a hefty sum for hosting or promoting fake product reviews online.
Faux five-star and rave reviews of less-than-stellar consumer goods can boost businesses' profits while deceiving consumers, according to the agency, which has proposed a rule to crack down on companies that buy, sell or promote phony user ratings of their products. If the rule is finalized, violators would be subject to penalties of up to $50,000 per infraction, depending on the case.
"The FTC has seen a massive increase in online reviews in the past few years," Serena Viswanathan, associate director of the FTC's division of ad practices, told CBS News. "We're all using them now to make decisions on whether to buy a product, where to stay on vacation. But unfortunately, with the rise in online reviews we have seen that bad actors can manipulate or fake reviews to deceive consumers for their own benefit."
New types of artificial intelligence tools, which can write human-sounding, but bogus, product reviews, also threaten to compound the problem by enabling bad actors to crank out far more fake reviews, according to the consumer watchdog.
Deceptive reviews hurt consumers by making it hard to obtain factual information about products, regulators say.
"The FTC's proposed rule would make it crystal clear that it's illegal to do things like write or sell fake reviews from people who don't exist or never used the product, or to buy positive reviews or even buy negative reviews about your competitors," Viswanathan said.
Boosting "honest companies"
A steady stream of phony product reviews can boost an item's visibility among consumers while obscuring products from more trustworthy companies, according to experts.
"Our proposed rule on fake reviews shows that we're using all available means to attack deceptive advertising in the digital age," said Samuel Levine, Director of the FTC's Bureau of Consumer Protection said in a statement. "The rule would trigger civil penalties for violators and should help level the playing field for honest companies."
According to a U.S. PIRG estimate, between 30% and 40% of online reviews are "concocted or are in some way not genuine." Bogus reviews surged during the pandemic when U.S. shoppers made the bulk of their purchases over the internet versus in stores, the consumer advocacy group noted.
Nearly 90% of online shoppers rely on reviews to guide their purchase decisions, according to PIRG.
"Not only does this harm consumers who are trying to make informed buying decisions, fake reviews also hurt honest businesses who make sure their online reviews are genuine. When people lose confidence in reviews, legitimate positive reviews don't mean as much. So consumers lose. Honest businesses lose. Dishonest businesses win," PIRG said in a report.
Stopping hijackers
The FTC's proposed rule would make selling and buying fake reviews illegal, while also cracking down on a practice known as "review hijacking." This consists of repurposing a genuine consumer review written for one product so that it appears to pertain to a substantially different product.
Also under the proposed enforcement, company insiders cannot review their own products, and businesses cannot bribe people to leave positive reviews or threaten them if they leave negative reviews. Companies would be permitted to offer customers gift cards for leaving a review, so long as the business doesn't dictate what people say about a product.
"We really think that the possibility of significant financial penalties under a rule should make some of these bad actors think twice about writing fake reviews and selling fake reviews," Viswanathan said.
veryGood! (878)
Related
- Whoopi Goldberg is delightfully vile as Miss Hannigan in ‘Annie’ stage return
- Need a consultant? This book argues hiring one might actually damage your institution
- Utah's new social media law means children will need approval from parents
- Yang Bing-Yi, patriarch of Taiwan's soup dumpling empire, has died
- Juan Soto to be introduced by Mets at Citi Field after striking record $765 million, 15
- Inside Clean Energy: Lawsuit Recalls How Elon Musk Was King of Rooftop Solar and then Lost It
- A judge sided with publishers in a lawsuit over the Internet Archive's online library
- We grade Fed Chair Jerome Powell
- Travis Hunter, the 2
- Plans to Reopen St. Croix’s Limetree Refinery Have Analysts Surprised and Residents Concerned
Ranking
- What to watch: O Jolie night
- In San Francisco’s Bayview-Hunters Point Neighborhood, Advocates Have Taken Air Monitoring Into Their Own Hands
- Elvis Presley’s Stepbrother Apologizes for “Derogatory” Allegations About Singer
- Concerns Linger Over a Secretive Texas Company That Owns the Largest Share of the Trans-Alaska Pipeline
- Small twin
- Biden asks banking regulators to toughen some rules after recent bank failures
- What to know about 4 criminal investigations into former President Donald Trump
- Yes, You Can Stay at Barbie's Malibu DreamHouse Because Life in Plastic Is Fantastic
Recommendation
'Survivor' 47 finale, part one recap: 2 players were sent home. Who's left in the game?
Binance lawsuit, bank failures and oil drilling
Biden Promised to Stop Oil Drilling on Public Lands. Is His Failure to Do So a Betrayal or a Smart Political Move?
Trump adds attorney John Lauro to legal team for special counsel's 2020 election probe
Appeals court scraps Nasdaq boardroom diversity rules in latest DEI setback
As Illinois Strains to Pass a Major Clean Energy Law, a Big Coal Plant Stands in the Way
Los Angeles investigating after trees used for shade by SAG-AFTRA strikers were trimmed by NBCUniversal
Former NFL Star Ryan Mallett Dead at 35 in Apparent Drowning at Florida Beach